[API] Some more cleanup ideas
thb at documentfoundation.org
Thu Nov 29 09:44:57 PST 2012
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > * should we kill [oneway] in IDL while at it? IIRC it went away in
> > the bridges anyway, via i#116038 or didn't it?
> Yes, [oneway] is effectively completely dead by now (compared to
> almost dead before the binary URP rewrite).
Killing in progress.
> > * a bit more extreme - kill ::com::sun::star inside office code, by
> > having a ~global "using namespace ::com::sun::star;" or
> > "namespace api = ::com::sun::star;" in e.g. sal/config.h, and
> > writing only _that_ out in the generated c++ headers?
> > (of course keep the old namespace for SDK. And yes, it's no new
> > idea, just a bit less extreme as what's proposed in the wiki)
> namespace css = com::sun:.star is the de-facto standard there, so
> yes, I wouldn't mind using that in the generated headers.
using namespace com::sun::star would save some 5 additional
characters - let me see what a test build yields...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the LibreOffice