[API] Some more cleanup ideas

[Thorsten Behrens]

Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> >  * should we kill [oneway] in IDL while at it? IIRC it went away in
> >    the bridges anyway, via i#116038 or didn't it?
> 
> Yes, [oneway] is effectively completely dead by now (compared to
> almost dead before the binary URP rewrite).
> 
Killing in progress.

> >  * a bit more extreme - kill ::com::sun::star inside office code, by
> >    having a ~global "using namespace ::com::sun::star;" or
> >    "namespace api = ::com::sun::star;" in e.g. sal/config.h, and
> >    writing only _that_ out in the generated c++ headers?
> >    (of course keep the old namespace for SDK. And yes, it's no new
> >    idea, just a bit less extreme as what's proposed in the wiki)
> 
> namespace css = com::sun:.star is the de-facto standard there, so
> yes, I wouldn't mind using that in the generated headers.
> 
using namespace com::sun::star would save some 5 additional
characters - let me see what a test build yields...

Cheers,

-- Thorsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20121129/6a2028c5/attachment.pgp>