ndtbl.cxx unused?

Miklos Vajna vmiklos at suse.cz
Tue Oct 23 01:05:48 PDT 2012

Hi David,

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:01:36AM +0200, David Tardon <dtardon at redhat.com> wrote:
> If a source file really contained only unused functions, it would likely
> have been found (and removed) with the help of callcatcher. Of course,
> that would not help if the source were not compiled at all (and we found
> such files on several occasions in the past)... I wonder if it would be
> possible to construct a (more or less) complete list of used source tree
> files from make dependencies; something that could be scripted and run
> periodically to ensure we are not accumulating unused cruft...

Not so easy, I think -- all OSX/Win-specific files are unused in a Linux
build, for example...


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list