LO, scan coverity 708945 (non virtual destructor in parent class)

[julien2412]

Similarly, there's CID#708952 (see
https://scan5.coverity.com:8443/reports.htm#v22002/p10276/fileInstanceId=47973599&defectInstanceId=14481123&mergedDefectId=708952).
Here, there's no consequence, since there's no specific destructor in
SfxListUndoAction. But if there's one in the future, it won't be taken into
account since destructor of SfxUndoArray isn't virtual
(see http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/svl/undo.hxx#136)



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-scan-coverity-708945-non-virtual-destructor-in-parent-class-tp4087082p4087118.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.