LO, scan coverity 708945 (non virtual destructor in parent class)

[Julien Nabet]

On 08/12/2013 00:04, Arnaud Versini wrote:
> Hi
>
> No specific destructor doesn't means no code generated, as we can see, 
> two OUString could be leaked by not executing SfxListUndoAction 
> destructor. Also an issue for me.
Of course some code is generated but I meant with no delete instruction 
or something, just an empty method. (Hope I got it right when I read 
about this ! :-) )

Julien