killing UNOLIBS_OOO
Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Fri Feb 15 10:27:20 PST 2013
Hi,
there is needless complexity added to gbuild by having all those "creative"
library naming schemes. One of them is UNOLIBS_OOO which is just like OOOLIBS,
except that they are named a bit different: libfoo.uno.so instead of
libfoolo.so. On dmake/build.pl and esp. with a dmake/build.pl/gbuild mix such a
change would have been needlessly painful because of the many places, were such
a name would show up.
I propose we kill of this needless separation, here is a start (with some more
rationale in the commit msg):
http://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/2169/
which also serves as a sample. As you see, its relatively simple by now -- the
only additional bookkeeping is in scp2.
If there is no violet opposition to this, I would push this to master and
create a EasyHack to kill of the other UNOLIBS_OOO too.
Any objections? Speak up now or be silent ;)
Best,
Bjoern
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list