[Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Norbert Thiebaud nthiebaud at gmail.com
Fri Feb 15 13:42:21 PST 2013


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:30:33PM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> -2 means I oppose the 'idea' of the patch. no amount of tweaking can
>> address my concerns.. one could use a -2 on a technically perfectly
>> valid/correct patch that remove dbaccess from libreoffice for
>> instance. -2 is effectively a veto because it is a sticky state that
>> remain even if a new version of the patch is uploaded... so as long as
>> there is a -2 one cannot Submit the patch, short of hacking gerrit or
>> pushing the patch directly to master, by-passsing gerrit-review
>> altogether.
>
> Can we maybe make the text:
> "There are concerns about the intend or implications of this change that need
> clarification. Please do not merge this before consensus is reached by
> discussion."

there is a hard limit of 50 chars.


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list