[PATCH libreoffice-4-0] SwDoc::Overwrite: probably a bad idea to overwrite fieldmark...

Michael Stahl (via Code Review) gerrit at gerrit.libreoffice.org
Fri Feb 15 13:49:38 PST 2013


Hi,

I have submitted a patch for review:

    https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2175

To pull it, you can do:

    git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/75/2175/1

SwDoc::Overwrite: probably a bad idea to overwrite fieldmarks

Change-Id: Iba94df67c21514cf4f5361bab28629c6d5d9d3e8
(cherry picked from commit 447bb5b5006051672ec526b75bec7db02d2db82e)
---
M sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx b/sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx
index 693e2bf..47829ea 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx
@@ -159,8 +159,18 @@
 static bool lcl_MayOverwrite( const SwTxtNode *pNode, const xub_StrLen nPos )
 {
     sal_Unicode cChr = pNode->GetTxt().GetChar( nPos );
-    return !( ( CH_TXTATR_BREAKWORD == cChr || CH_TXTATR_INWORD == cChr ) &&
-              (0 != pNode->GetTxtAttrForCharAt( nPos ) ) );
+    switch (cChr)
+    {
+        case CH_TXTATR_BREAKWORD:
+        case CH_TXTATR_INWORD:
+            return !pNode->GetTxtAttrForCharAt(nPos);// how could there be none?
+        case CH_TXT_ATR_FIELDSTART:
+        case CH_TXT_ATR_FIELDEND:
+        case CH_TXT_ATR_FORMELEMENT:
+            return false;
+        default:
+            return true;
+    }
 }
 
 static void lcl_SkipAttr( const SwTxtNode *pNode, SwIndex &rIdx, xub_StrLen &rStart )

-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2175
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iba94df67c21514cf4f5361bab28629c6d5d9d3e8
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: core
Gerrit-Branch: libreoffice-4-0
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Stahl <mstahl at redhat.com>


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list