[PATCH libreoffice-4-0] SwDoc::Overwrite: probably a bad idea to overwrite fieldmark...
Michael Stahl (via Code Review)
gerrit at gerrit.libreoffice.org
Fri Feb 15 13:49:38 PST 2013
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2175
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/75/2175/1
SwDoc::Overwrite: probably a bad idea to overwrite fieldmarks
Change-Id: Iba94df67c21514cf4f5361bab28629c6d5d9d3e8
(cherry picked from commit 447bb5b5006051672ec526b75bec7db02d2db82e)
---
M sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx b/sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx
index 693e2bf..47829ea 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/doc/docedt.cxx
@@ -159,8 +159,18 @@
static bool lcl_MayOverwrite( const SwTxtNode *pNode, const xub_StrLen nPos )
{
sal_Unicode cChr = pNode->GetTxt().GetChar( nPos );
- return !( ( CH_TXTATR_BREAKWORD == cChr || CH_TXTATR_INWORD == cChr ) &&
- (0 != pNode->GetTxtAttrForCharAt( nPos ) ) );
+ switch (cChr)
+ {
+ case CH_TXTATR_BREAKWORD:
+ case CH_TXTATR_INWORD:
+ return !pNode->GetTxtAttrForCharAt(nPos);// how could there be none?
+ case CH_TXT_ATR_FIELDSTART:
+ case CH_TXT_ATR_FIELDEND:
+ case CH_TXT_ATR_FORMELEMENT:
+ return false;
+ default:
+ return true;
+ }
}
static void lcl_SkipAttr( const SwTxtNode *pNode, SwIndex &rIdx, xub_StrLen &rStart )
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2175
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iba94df67c21514cf4f5361bab28629c6d5d9d3e8
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: core
Gerrit-Branch: libreoffice-4-0
Gerrit-Owner: Michael Stahl <mstahl at redhat.com>
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list