killing UNOLIBS_OOO

[Stephan Bergmann]

On 02/15/2013 07:27 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> there is needless complexity added to gbuild by having all those "creative"
> library naming schemes. One of them is UNOLIBS_OOO which is just like OOOLIBS,
> except that they are named a bit different: libfoo.uno.so instead of
> libfoolo.so. On dmake/build.pl and esp. with a dmake/build.pl/gbuild mix such a
> change would have been needlessly painful because of the many places, were such
> a name would show up.

The sourpuss that I am can't help but point out that that "lib" prefix 
is a concession to the idiosyncrasies of the linker, and has no place in 
libraries that nobody links against.  But if it helps...  ;)

Stephan