About ucbdemo (still used?)
Stephan Bergmann
sbergman at redhat.com
Mon Jan 21 02:56:50 PST 2013
On 01/19/2013 06:05 PM, julien2412 wrote:
> Cppcheck detected this:
> ucb/workben/ucb/ucbdemo.cxx
> 1735 syntaxError error Invalid number of character (() when these macros are
> defined: ''.
>
> I fixed parenthesis (there was not just one problem) but I don't know how to
> check this since "make ucbdemo" tells:
> make: *** No rule to make target `ucbdemo'. Stop.
> (even if I run this in <LO root>/ucb/workben/ucb
>
> Is ucbdemo still used? How to build it?
Any */workben/ code (and there is quite some of it across modules) is
not routinely built, so easily bitrots, and in most (all?) cases hasn't
even been migrated to gbuild. Whether or not the bitrotten code would
be useful if it hadn't bitrotted is often lost to history.
It isn't entirely clear to me whether it is better to remove any
apparently bitrotten */workben/ code (it doesn't pollute the source tree
any more, and people can resurrect it from the git repo if they want to
use it again) or leave it there (people who might get interested in the
code in the future have a better chance at finding it again if it is
available in the current source tree, compared to just available in the
git repo's history). But it's likely better to err here in favour of a
clean, small repo and just remove any bitrotten */workben/ code.
Stephan
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list