build with code coverage
bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Tue Jul 9 14:30:32 PDT 2013
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:11:29PM +0200, John Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Michael Stahl <mstahl at redhat.com> wrote:
> > i'm afraid that right now we have so many obvious large gaps in test
> > coverage that using test coverage tools is a bit premature. perhaps one
> > run per release cycle would be informative for general trends but likely
> > few developers have the time to look at the result in detail anyway (i
> > don't).
> Yes, of course this is what i meant to say.
I just filed an EasyHack on this:
More information about the LibreOffice