LibreOffice & LTO
Martin Liška
marxin.liska at gmail.com
Wed Mar 27 04:11:21 PDT 2013
Thank you Peter for your patch, I hope it will help me. Unfortunately,
I face now some kind of undefined symbol in saxparser, please let see
bugzilla.
Martin
On 25 March 2013 20:00, Peter Foley <pefoley2 at verizon.net> wrote:
> I haven't run into the mentioned bug, but compiling with LTO is so
> slow that I've only done it once or twice.
> The multiple definition errors should all be fixed now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Jan Holesovsky <kendy at suse.cz> wrote:
>> Hi Martin
>>
>> Martin Liška píše v Ne 24. 03. 2013 v 20:26 +0100:
>>
>>> Looks like
>>> there's a big issue that must be done in a build system of
>>> libreoffice: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61627 to
>>> clear the way for gcc LTO optimization? What do you think about that?
>>
>> Please let me move the conversation to the LibreOffice developers
>> mailing list - I hope you don't mind :-)
>>
>> Bjoern has a plan regarding the includes; we plan to do the change after
>> 4.0.2 is out, but need to check which of the possible approaches is
>> better.
>>
>> Other than that - Peter Foley is recently working on merged libraries,
>> might be good to check the most recent master to see what is the status
>> today, and if you are still hitting the problem (I suspect you are going
>> to, but...)
>>
>> All the best,
>> Kendy
>>
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list