Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

[Thorsten Behrens]

Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> The dev-ML is to discuss code.
> code come as patch, and preferably as gerrit patch... so seing the
> patch that are proposed via gerrit is the core function of the ML,
> just like before gerrit they where posted to the ML .
> 
Yup.

> If we remove all the [PATCH] from the ML, what is left ? a
> dev-discuss list ?
> 
It is already now the case that there is a disconnect between
discussing code, or a concrete problem, and the subsequent gerrit
patch submission (case in point: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3699,
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3698 and Noel Grandin's conversion
operators for UNO thread), I'm very hesitant to widen that gap.

Devil's advocate question: with that two-list proposal, where to
discuss a given patch? ;)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20130502/7f35c9f4/attachment.pgp>