should we drop DEFAULT_TO_ENGLISH_FOR_PACKING?
David Tardon
dtardon at redhat.com
Fri May 10 06:45:13 PDT 2013
Hi,
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:25:27PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:08:16PM +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:35 PM, David Tardon <dtardon at redhat.com> wrote:
> > No, I don't think we want install sets without en-US. But we need to
> > make sure that we don't have runtime problems when a localized file is
> > missing. Now there is the en-US copy, but after your proposed patch
> > there will be nothing. Not many language dependent files remained, I
> > think AutoText files are the only example.
>
> I am not aware of anything else either. But that can easily by verified
> by checking the installation log.
The only replacement warnings I see in the log are for
autotextshare_en-US.filelist, which installs the autotext files.
D.
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list