How are installation sets being built?
mstahl at redhat.com
Thu Oct 10 07:12:20 PDT 2013
On 10/10/13 09:14, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/09/2013 10:58 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>> I don't know why it is used for Mac, as there are no individual
>> packages, but I assume that's scp2 heritage.
> ....which brings me back to my original question for a universal trigger
> whether or not to produce installation sets during a build.
> Seeing that --enable-epm currently effectively fulfills that role
> everywhere but on Windows, one option would be to make it fulfill that
> role on Windows too. (I have a local patch to do that.)
> The alternative would be to introduce an explicit
> --enable-installation-sets. Opinions, anyone?
we already have --with-package-format, much simpler to do nothing if the
user doesn't specify that than adding another option, or using
--enable-epm on a plaform where EPM is irrelevant.
More information about the LibreOffice