Question on dubious code
matteo.casalin at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 17 14:33:48 PDT 2013
On 10/07/2013 03:35 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 19:45 +0200, Matteo Casalin wrote:
>> looks wrong to me since aUserData cannot start with both aProt and
>> ".". I had a look at older revisions, but the logic remains the same at
>> least from when it was integrated in 2005 with commit
> So, the commit where the problem appears seems to be
> 710a553683cef16be38fa8ef35b1dc88fb607ba4 and references #i35133#, but I
> think that's a further typo and the real bug was #i35113# which has as
> its 2nd last comment "document will be attached later" and they never
> were :-)
>> Does anybody knows ho to deal with this (the comparison with "./" should
>> be done after aProt, is completely unnecessary, or something else)?
> Well, the intent was presumably to see if the token
> *following* ...Package: started with "./" but seeing as its been 9 years
> since that code was introduced I recommend you just delete the
> impossible-to-reach if block.
Sorry for the long delay, fixed now with
Many thanks for the review!
More information about the LibreOffice