Questions about getCppuType
Stephan Bergmann
sbergman at redhat.com
Fri Apr 25 03:18:22 PDT 2014
On 04/25/2014 07:55 AM, julien2412 wrote:
> Seeing the number of times getCppuType is used, I've got several questions
> about this:
> - what's the use of it? It resembles at the first look to "typeid" but I
> suppose it's not this.
Yes, it's to the C++ UNO language binding what typeid is to C++, mapping
from a C++ type representing a UNO type to a css::uno::Type instance
describing that UNO type.
getCppuType is not without flaws though, and cppu::UnoType should be
used instead.
> - could there be an alternative? (eg a more "native"/straightforward C++
> way)?
Not really.
> - if it still must be used, could the C style cast be changed in static cast
> (to be sure the cast is in build time and so the check is also in build
> time)?
What cast are you talking about? The one in the typical usage like
getCppuType((T*)0)? Sure, nothing keeps you from writing that as
getCppuType(static_cast<T*>(0)), or better yet, cppu::UnoType<T>::get(),
instead.
Stephan
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list