[Bug 53472] FORMATTING: Integral Symbols too small for some integrands

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53472

--- Comment #13 from Roberto <rgnodev at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Hi everybody, I was planning to put hands on this issue as my first time
> hacking L.O..
> I would like to ask some questions on which general directions it may be
> better to take:
> 
> - Reading past discussion, it seems to me that there is some agreement on
> the fact that dynamically-sized integrals/sums/products/etc. should be given
> as a command additional to "int" & C.. In other words, dynamic size should
> be optional. Is that correct?
> 
> - There seems to be some work done by Véghelyi András in the past (see
> previous commments in this issue). That code may possibly be a good starting
> point.
> I'm not familiar at all with Gerrit and the rest of the patch/merge workflow
> in L.O., but is this code available anywhere? Was it integrated at the time
> in L.O.? Or, how could I check such a thing? 
> 
> Comments of any kind are very appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Matteo

Dear Mateo:
About your first point, my humble opinion is that dynamic size should be
optional (some people think that different instances of the same operator,
belonging to the same line, should not have different sizes; despite of the
size of their operands. Check
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=45511 for details).
I have no information about your questions in your second point.

Kind regards.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20140221/ce9e9e06/attachment.html>