minutes of ESC call ...

[Charles-H. Schulz]

On 9 mai 2014 16:01:09 CEST, Italo Vignoli <italo at italovignoli.com> wrote:
>On 08/05/14 17:29, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
>> * Should we simplify version numbering? (Kendy)
>>     + So far major.minor.micro, but due to our release plan, all our
>versions
>>       are continuous improvements - does it make sense to still keep
>'major'?
>>         [ ie. should we do 4.3.0 -> 5.0, 4.4.3 -> 6.3, etc.? ]
>
>Marketing wise, this should be carefully prepared, as otherwise it
>would
>become a real problem for users (and also for journalists). They have
>just become accustomed to this release numbering and to the fast pace
>of
>time based releases, and the risk is that they would not understand why
>we are changing.


Esp. When we are about to change the "stable" to "mature".

Best, 

Charles. 

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.