coverity warnings update, < 170, 0.04 density

[Michael Stahl]

On 03.11.2014 16:24, Caolán McNamara wrote:

> 705391 Inferred misuse of enum really bugs me.
> xmloff/source/transform/MergeElemTContext.cxx:235 where
> XML_ATACTION_MOVE_FROM_ELEM_RNG2ISO_DATETIME is from a completely
> different enum than all the other cases. It looks completely bogus, but
> I don't know if it should be some other condition or if that case
> belongs to another switch.
> 

that was a nasty case, fixed in commit
76dce95eed6892d729fbea2b990911edd82ded82