mstahl at redhat.com
Tue Oct 14 07:13:22 PDT 2014
On 14.10.2014 15:46, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 12:06 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
>> I havent bibisected with that repo myself yet, just saw that e.g.:
>> has a lot of skipped commits.
> (Looks like I at least cannot easily reproduce that on my Fedora
> machine, as that bibisect repo is apparently build --with-system-jpeg so
> requires a libjpeg.so.8 I don't have.)
yes, that's an endemic problem with all bibisect repos, except the very
latest from Bjoern, they're all missing --without-system-jpeg and thus
require that particular libjpeg.so.8 on the system. i've worked around
that by just building it from source and LD_PRELOADing it.
on a related note, why are we bundling IJG libjpeg-8  ... even
libjpeg-9 on master with LO, instead of libjpeg-turbo  like most
linux distros do nowadays? apparently the prevailing opinion is that
libjpeg > 6 just adds questionable new features that, when used, cause
interop problems with older software that supports only the ISO
standard, i.e., what's implemented in libjpeg-6, whereas libjpeg-turbo
is standard JPEG and is quite optimized on x86 CPUs.
this seems to be a good summary of the situation:
More information about the LibreOffice