Should we use boost::math::log1p/expm1 instead of rtl_math_log1p/expm1 ?

julien2412 serval2412 at
Mon Sep 15 12:38:48 PDT 2014


should  it worth it to replace rtl_math_log1p/rtl_math_expm1 and related by
boost::math::log1p/expm1 ?
Or should we let the code as it is right now?

Since we already use Boost, I thought it could be interesting to use it even
more, waiting by a even more C++11 compatibility (since this standard
includes these 2 functions).


View this message in context:
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list