Should we use boost::math::log1p/expm1 instead of rtl_math_log1p/expm1 ?

[julien2412]

Hello,

Following
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a3ad01dc1e07da21182077bd899094fd73f57714,
should  it worth it to replace rtl_math_log1p/rtl_math_expm1 and related by
boost::math::log1p/expm1 ?
Or should we let the code as it is right now?

Since we already use Boost, I thought it could be interesting to use it even
more, waiting by a even more C++11 compatibility (since this standard
includes these 2 functions).

Julien



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Should-we-use-boost-math-log1p-expm1-instead-of-rtl-math-log1p-expm1-tp4122334.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.