Should we use boost::math::log1p/expm1 instead of rtl_math_log1p/expm1 ?
serval2412 at yahoo.fr
Mon Sep 15 12:38:48 PDT 2014
should it worth it to replace rtl_math_log1p/rtl_math_expm1 and related by
Or should we let the code as it is right now?
Since we already use Boost, I thought it could be interesting to use it even
more, waiting by a even more C++11 compatibility (since this standard
includes these 2 functions).
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Should-we-use-boost-math-log1p-expm1-instead-of-rtl-math-log1p-expm1-tp4122334.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the LibreOffice