mstahl at redhat.com
Wed Sep 24 04:38:14 PDT 2014
On 17/09/14 14:07, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Eike Rathke píše v St 17. 09. 2014 v 12:50 +0200:
>> Also, if bug IDs are present in the revert summary, shouldn't the
>> corresponding bugs be set to REOPENED if they were already resolved or
> I'd prefer not to do it, similarly as we don't close the bugs
> automagically when the commit has the bug id.
> Sometimes there are partial reverts, sometimes there are 'Related'
> commits that can be not crucial for the bug itself.
even better, sometimes the actual fix is reverted and some other commit
actually fixed the bug already in a "better" way :) the revert's commit
message should indicate this of course.
> The comment will go to the bug, so I'd prefer to leave the decision
> whether to re-open or not up to the QA guys, probably?
yes that's enough.
More information about the LibreOffice