Request for late push to 4.4.1

Miklos Vajna vmiklos at collabora.co.uk
Thu Feb 12 01:11:17 PST 2015


Hi Stuart,

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:46:29PM -0700, V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote at utsa.edu> wrote:
> Request for late review  for 4.4.1
> 
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c7e907f58f8d0791ee304b42de769f43102522e9
> 
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ad14ed0bbf80dd95dca6e0dea6edbe5fb68f9f26
> 
> The first corrects 4.4 MAB  tdf#88935 and has been picked up in 4.4  for 
> the 4.4.2 branch, the later further improves image drawing frame refresh
> handling of image cache.  Believe both to be worthwhile late pushes for the
> 4.4.1 cycle.

This is not how things work. :-)

If you want to see a commit backported to 4-4-1, then please build 4-4-1
yourself, cherry-pick the commit, build-test it, then test that the
commit on 4-4-1 indeed fixes the problem (otherwise there is no point in
backporting it), and if so, push to gerrit.  Once it's on gerrit, it'll
get reviewed as usual, and at the end either rejected or submitted to
the release branch.

The point is that who wants to have something on a branch does the work
of backporting (which may or may not be trivial depending on how much
conflicts you get), not the reviewers, who are already the bottleneck.

Thanks,

Miklos
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20150212/bb66cc82/attachment.sig>


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list