Singleton is never a service?

[sberg]

On 02/22/2015 05:42 PM, julien2412 [via Document Foundation Mail 
Archive] wrote:
> Noticing by chance
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=a94390d20c50125e25e29431ca15ca2ca6683d17,
> I noticed with Opengrok that there were some similar cases, see
> http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=%22singleton+name%22&project=core&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=
> eg:
> http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/framework/util/fwk.component#33
>
> Should we clean these too or we can't generalize this rule?

No, a94390d20c50125e25e29431ca15ca2ca6683d17 is about cases where the 
name of a UNOIDL singleton (cf. the .idl files in offapi) is erroneously 
also used for a service declaration in a .component file.

In general, in implementation described in a .component file can list an 
arbitrary number of services and singletons.





--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Singleton-is-never-a-service-tp4141020p4141072.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20150223/0c6a2f2f/attachment.html>