test infrastructure ideas appreciated ...

[Robert Antoni Buj i Gelonch]

$ curl -OL
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/openmp/trunk/runtime/tools/check-depends.pl
$ curl -OL
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/openmp/trunk/runtime/tools/lib/tools.pm
$ curl -OL
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/openmp/trunk/runtime/tools/lib/Platform.pm
$ curl -OL
https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/openmp/trunk/runtime/tools/lib/Uname.pm
$ chmod +x check-depends.pl
$ ./check-depends.pl
/Applications/LibreOfficeDev.app/Contents/Frameworks/libwpd-0.10.10.dylib
check-depends.pl: (x) Fail to parse otool output:
check-depends.pl: (x)
/Applications/LibreOfficeDev.app/Contents/Frameworks/libwpd-0.10.10.dylib:
check-depends.pl: (x) >>> /usr/local/lib/libwpd-0.10.10.dylib
(compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.0.0)
check-depends.pl: (x)
/@.__________________________________________________OOO/lib/librevenge-0.0.0.dylib
(compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.2.0)
check-depends.pl: (x)     /usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib (compatibility version
1.0.0, current version 120.0.0)
check-depends.pl: (x)     /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version
1.0.0, current version 1213.0.0)
check-depends.pl: (x) (eof)


2015-06-04 21:04 GMT+02:00 Michael Stahl <mstahl at redhat.com>:

> On 04.06.2015 18:32, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 15:44 +0200, Robert Antoni Buj i Gelonch wrote:
> >> We could add an automatic validation test for checking the discovery
> >> of dynamic library dependencies on OS X & Linux.
> >>       * OS X: otool -L file
> >>       * Linux: ldd file
> >
> >       Sounds interesting - the concern would be having added new
> > dependencies ? or what could we check with that ?
>
> that's actually a good idea, as the recent bibisect Linux 5.0 accident
> has demonstrated, see also commit
> f4844a9abebcb0451161625c42a1e2b48796102d
>
> we could have a test that runs something like readelf -d | grep
> "(NEEDED)", filter out our own libraries, and then filters against a
> whilelist of known-good system libraries; anything outside the whitelist
> shouldn't be required.
>
> it might even be useful on Mac OS X: while you do have a proper SDK
> there and not a random collection of -devel packages, it might still be
> possible that some bundled library's crazy configure script finds some
> random stuff installed via Fink/MacPorts/etc., which would cause the
> same issues.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>



-- 
http://about.me/rbuj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20150604/76ba5ae2/attachment.html>