organizing our "crasher" bugs ?
Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Wed May 27 07:48:11 PDT 2015
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:36:01PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 03:25:24PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > What would work ideally for me is to someone get the subset of all
> > crashes that are ~100% reproducible under Linux and ordered by the
> > number of steps required to reproduce. Any ideas on how to generate that
> > subset ?
Another hint of a good, clean, solvable bug is a limited number of comments:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Cop_sys%2Clongdescs.count&list_id=539737&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&short_desc=crash&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr
once you have more than 10 comments on a bug, there is a high chance of some
"can reproduce on $foo", "cant reproduce on $bar" ping-pong going on.
Best,
Bjoern
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list