[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla: Adding new Status for 'abandoned' bugs?
dtardon at redhat.com
Fri Nov 13 01:20:30 PST 2015
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:33:47AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:00:16AM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > Hi Wols,
> > On Wednesday, 2015-11-11 19:09:39 +0000, Wols Lists wrote:
> > > It's getting more wordy but INSUFFICIENT DATA AVAILABLE is a bit more
> > > neutral.
> > <nitpick>
> > insufficient data can not be available
> > </nitpick>
> Nitpick, but true none the less: if this is really what you guys want to do, it
> should be DATA AVAILABLE INSUFFICIENT instead -- or DATA PROVIDED INSUFFICIENT.
And how exactly this differs from plain "INSUFFICIENT DATA"? Are there
any other data relevant to the bug than those PROVIDED by the reporter /
triagers (i.e., AVAILABLE in the bug)?
More information about the LibreOffice