unit test failures (llvm/clang/scan-build/clang/clang++)

Maarten Hoes hoes.maarten at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 02:14:28 PST 2015


On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> On 11/23/2015 11:02 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com
>> <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > On 11/23/2015 10:42 AM, Maarten Hoes wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Stephan Bergmann
>> <sbergman at redhat.com <mailto:sbergman at redhat.com>
>>  >>  > The Clang included in Fedora 23 is known to be broken,
>>  >> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282645#c3> "Clang
fails to
>>  >> link boost library."
>>  >>
>>  >> Instead of using the pre-build binaries/packages of Fedora, I build
from
>>  >> source. Of course, that doesnt mean it couldnt still be broken ;-)
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > See my recipe in the "By the way" paragraph in the bug I linked.
>>
>> Thanks. So that works around the clang bug, only to uncover a bug in the
>> Fedora 23 GNU libstdc++ ? Looks like Im screwed.
>
>
> Note that the libstdc++ issue is in debug-mode--only code, so LO is only
affected (and the little additional patch I presented to fix things up only
needed) with --enable-dbgutil.
>
Ah. And, perhaps, affected with '--enable-debug' ? Im using that. So just
omitting '--enable-debug' should make the clang build succeed ? Or am I
(once again) missing the point here ?


- Maarten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20151123/2e922590/attachment.html>


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list