New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for LibreOffice
caolanm at redhat.com
Mon Aug 29 13:28:04 UTC 2016
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 11:31 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Was there a way to annotate false positives like this (caused by a
> FALSE_POSITIVE macro being defined as either 0 or 1, depending on
> configuration) in the source code?
If the code was
const bool bFoo =
bool bFoo =
coverity wouldn't complain. Doesn't quite fit this case though.
More information about the LibreOffice