QA test for BASIC functions

[Miklos Vajna]

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:00:28AM -0700, Laurent BP <jumbo4444 at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> - Advantage : in case of error (function does not work anymore), message
> will be clearer as it will show the name of the function. With actual
> behavior, only the name of the test file is displayed, and each test file
> contains many functions
> - Drawback : this will create many test files (~100 if I'm not wrong), which
> may increase time of each build with check

I assume even 100 files will not take much time to test. This would also
have the benefit that when a test fails, you can know what is to code to
debug. (Closer to a real unit test, instead of the current
integration-like test.)

> Do you think there are more advantages than drawbacks? If yes, I'm ready to
> add these functions, but I want first to know if there is some benefit.

I think this would be a great improvement.

Regards,

Miklos
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20161213/c34fcd9d/attachment.sig>