Bug 89387 - improve performance for some matrix operations

Filippo giacchè filippo.giacche at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 09:59:28 UTC 2016


Hi Eike,
thanks for your answer..
just a few question...

-why there is no need to modify that function?
there are many function with "fixme" near them (in
core/sc/source/core/tool/scmatrix.cxx), are they not to be
modified/optimized?

- what is the main goal of this task (tdf#bug 89387) ?


thanks,

Kind regards
Filippo Giacchè




2016-12-13 19:24 GMT+00:00 Eike Rathke <erack at redhat.com>:

> Hi Filippo,
>
> On Monday, 2016-12-12 16:40:50 +0100, Filippo giacchè wrote:
>
> > I ' m working on Bug 89387 - improve performance for some matrix
> operations.
> > I ' m looking the function ScFullMatrix::MatCopy in
> > /core/sc/source/core/tool/scmatrix.cxx and I wonder how can I try it?,
> how
> > can I test the performance of the function?
>
> Just for completeness, as mentioned on IRC already, MatCopy() is used in
> the DDE spreadsheet function to copy result values,
> sc/source/core/tool/interpr2.cxx ScInterpreter::ScDde()
>
> I wouldn't waste too much time to optimize that specific MatCopy
> function as that is the only place where it is used.
>
>   Eike
>
> --
> LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n
> transpositionizer.
> GPG key "ID" 0x65632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563
> 2D3A
> Better use 64-bit 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A here is why: https://evil32.com/
> Care about Free Software, support the FSFE https://fsfe.org/support/?erack
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20161214/6507dc20/attachment.html>


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list