Renaming sal_Unicode to a less misleading name?
sbergman at redhat.com
Mon Feb 15 08:48:02 UTC 2016
On 02/15/2016 09:30 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Trying to encode semantic differences (like between sal_utf16be and
> sal_utf16le) requires discipline (as it does not get any aid from the
"with typedefs" I had forgotten to add after the first parenthetical remark
> compiler's type checking), and when it starts to go sour it's probably
> worse than not trying to make the distinction in the type system in the
> first place (as now variables labelled to be of type sal_utf16be will
> misleadingly contain values of type sal_utf16le).
More information about the LibreOffice