Remove ActiveX from LibreOffice

[Bryan Quigley]

Hi Rick,

ActiveX is deprecated by Microsoft and will be less useful (or not at
all) on newer MS browsers.  I'm unsure if it ever worked (or was
supposed to) let you embed ActiveX controls into LibreOffice itself.

Kind regards,
Bryan

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Rick C. Hodgin
<rick.c.hodgin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why are you removing ActiveX from LibreOffice? Excel supports it, and it is
> desirable for integration with Windows apps like C#, Visual Basic, Visual
> FoxPro. It allows those other apps to integrate the app directly into their
> app.
>
> I have tried to use it previously, but could not find documentation for it.
> If it's an unused feature, I'd suggest that's why than for other reasons.
>
> Best regards,
> Rick C. Hodgin
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Chris Sherlock
> Sent: Mon, 11/01/2016 08:21 PM
> To: Ashod Nakashian
> CC: libreoffice ; Bryan Quigley
> Subject: Re: Remove ActiveX from LibreOffice
>
> That sounds pretty reasonable to me.
>
> Out of interest, just how “integrated” is this with the code? If someone
> wanted to create an external project on GitHub or some place like this,
> would it be feasible?
>
> I guess I’m trying to understand how much of core it touches… to reimplement
> an ActiveX control outside of the main tree, would a developer need to fork
> LibreOffice entirely, or could they maintain their codebranch entirely
> seperately and update the control if necessary after we do our changes to
> the main codebase?
>
> I’m definitely for removing all vestiges of ActiveX from LO, but the more I
> think about it the more I can see that some corporation somewhere might be
> affected, far more so than the remove of NPAPI… giving them the option of a
> control that can be maintained outside of the main project would be nice :-)
>
> Chris
>
> On 12 Jan 2016, at 9:37 AM, Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Bryan Quigley <gquigs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anywhere else we should post this?
>>
>
> Ideally the note would show up unintrusively upon loading/using the ActiveX
> itself. Unfortunately we can't show a message box or some such UI, in case
> the ActiveX is used non-interactively (in which case it'd block forever,
> becoming unusable).
>
> So the next best thing to do is include the note in the installation, which
> should be hard to miss if made prominent (unless automated in silent mode).
>
> This would get the attention of possibly the users, if not the developers
> (who might not even test out new versions as they come out, and expect
> things to work as before). Users can contact developers, I expect, or at
> least plan accordingly. Regardless, all we want is to give advance warning
> before the day someone installs a newer version and be met with the surprise
> of missing ActiveX altogether.
>
> The installation and release notes seem to be the most reasonable places, if
> not upon using the ActiveX itself. Unless others have better ideas.
>
>