tdf#96482 (5.0.4 regression introduced in fix of tdf#94069) [was: minutes of ESC call ...]

[Lionel Elie Mamane]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:35:16PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:28:53PM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> 1;2802;0c> 
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:49 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote:

> > > commit 87199d3829257420429057336283c55be6ae7481
> > > Author: Michael Meeks <michael.meeks at collabora.com>
> > > Date:   Tue Nov 24 16:59:29 2015 +0000
> > > 
> > >     vcl: re-introduce idle handling.
> > > 
> > > which fixed the problem on master/5-1. Its non-trivial to backport that
> > > though to 5-0. Not sure how that should look if applied to 5-0
> > 
> > 	Right; it's ~impossible to back-port without some seriously
> > heavy-lifting / re-qualification process - I'm amused/interested to hear
> > that it fixed something ;-) I'd not support it going into -5-0 really.
> 
> > 	I'd suggest that it'd be better to work out what two (or more) events
> > are getting mis-ordered to cause the issue in the bug - and get stack
> > traces from those code-points in both 5.0 and 5.1 - and I'd be happy to
> > take a look; perhaps in-person at FOSDEM.
> 
> You are saying that this commit is not in 5-1?

My "git log" says it is in 5-1.

-- 
Lionel