Coding style using shared_ptr

[Stephan Bergmann]

On 06/01/2016 09:33 AM, Aptitude Testing Team wrote:
> We have an inconsistency with the coding style in our shared_ptr typedefs
>
> cd core/include; grep -R "typedef std::shared_ptr"
>
> Shows (for "std::shared_ptr<Foo>") we have "FooPtr" or "FooRef" or "PFoo"
>
> Should we standardise this?
>
> FooPtr is my preference.

...and std::shared_ptr<Foo> is mine.  (That is, most of the time I find 
such trivial typedefs to be more of a distraction ("what's that FooPtr 
thing? a plain *, some std smart ptr, or maybe an rtl::Reference? lets 
look it up") than a help.  I think we even have an EasyHack to get rid 
of them.)