Firebird doesn't support MSVC 2015
mstahl at redhat.com
Wed Mar 2 12:11:03 UTC 2016
On 02.03.2016 12:44, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 03/02/2016 12:32 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> i think we can do without firebird for now, it's an experimental feature
>> anyway so it can be fixed at a later time when somebody gets around to it.
> Given how firebird keeps popping up as one of the worst external modules
> whenever you fiddle with a new toolchain, are we sure it'll ever get out
> of the experimental feature status? Or would it be time to search for
> better alternatives right from the start?
personally i'd be inclined towards alternatives that are less likely to
trigger toolchain problems - maybe there's a SQL database implemented
in, say, Java somewhere...
More information about the LibreOffice