Fix for Bug 98940
matteo.casalin at yahoo.com
Sun May 1 16:59:58 UTC 2016
On 04/29/2016 06:52 PM, Matteo Casalin wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I submitted to gerrit a one-line fix for bug 98940, a regression introduced by a previous commit of mine.
> I think it's quite safe to push it to master, and I will do that in a few days unless someone reviews/pushes it in the meantime.
> The aforementioned bug, however, affects the 5.1 branch and should be evaluated for backporting: what is the best approach to be followed for this?
> Thanks in advance and kind regards
As an addition, the bug reporter originally asked for two fixes:
1. allow again -1 as a valid value, that should be fixed by my patch at:
2. allow a maximum "maximum length" positive value higher than 32767. I
see two issues with this:
* that value is set by VCLXMultilineEdit::setProperty, that uses a
and I have no idea if this can be changed or if it is stable api
* The control widget can takes values higher than the aforementioned
32767, and this besides being misleading can also be a source of
undesired behavior (is the chosen value truncated, saturated or
Any comment is much appreciated.
More information about the LibreOffice