[Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

[Jan Iversen]

> What is the workflow if I see a bug report that might be easy enough to be an easy hack, but I have
> zero knowledge about the underlying code? My ability to evaluate it stops before the first action step
> detailed in response to Problem 4. So, CC Jan and ask his opinion? Does any keyword need to be set?

Whenever somebody sets keyword=easyhack I get a message next morning, so need for a keyword in that case. No need to put me CC.

I control all easyhack and currently set status=NEEDINFO if information is missing. I agree that using keyword=needsDevEval instead would make more sense.

rgds
jan I.