Some points on clang-format usage

[Miklos Vajna]

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:28:57AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm somewhat undecided whether or not to do that change to .clang-format
> now.  My feeling is that reformatting of comments is a pain and a gotcha
> anyway.

Turning this on would also have the effect that e.g.

> void f() {
>     statement1(); // lengthy comment comment comment comment comment comment comment comment comment
>      // comment comment comment comment comment comment
>     statement2();
> }

would be formatted (due to the extra -- probably unwanted -- space) as

> void f() {
>     statement1(); // lengthy comment comment comment comment comment comment comment comment comment
>                   // comment comment comment comment comment comment
>     statement2();
> }

which might be misleading as well. So leaving at as-is has some
benefits, I think.

Regards,

Miklos
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20171215/c7b6042a/attachment.sig>