xmlsec patches

[Thorsten Behrens]

Caolán McNamara wrote:
> So, do we know enough that the customkeymanage part isn't necessary for
> any known normal use of xml signing, I mean if we disable it, or build
> against a system version that doesn't have it, that the uses we do know
> about continue to work.
> 
I have vague recollections that might be related to the Belgian eID
initiative at that time, which incidentally wikipedia says got a smart
card chip around 2005:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_national_identity_card

Perhaps that rings a bell for someone still? And was that ever
supported on Linux?

Cheers,

-- Thorsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20170215/3aa724b5/attachment.sig>