New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for LibreOffice

Stephan Bergmann sbergman at redhat.com
Mon Feb 20 09:34:12 UTC 2017


On 02/20/2017 10:24 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 10:06 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> When I now search for 1401344 (or similar 1401342) in the Coverity
>> web UI, I get "No Issues found".  You probably filtered them away in
>> some way, Caloán?
>
> Presumably they are caught by the "systemheaders" filter of
> /usr/include/* but they are presumably the same as e.g. 1401343

101342/44 claim that there's UNO exceptions trying to pass through 
std::shared_ptr internal functions marked noexcept, while 1401343 et al 
are the well-known assumed-to-throw-within-dtor case.  So that made me 
curious what it is exactly that Coverity thinks it sees there.

>> But why do they completely disappear from the database?
>
> I dunno, I don't have any particular extra insight into coverity's
> website internals

Yeah, that wasn't directed at anyone in particular.


More information about the LibreOffice mailing list