Fwd: [Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sal/qa

Caolán McNamara caolanm at redhat.com
Mon Jul 24 11:26:15 UTC 2017

On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 08:29 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> I think this memory leak is actually required in this case.
> SAL_NO_ACQUIRE means that the ref count of the internal pipe object
> is not incremented and therefore during the destruction of the
> osl::Pipe we are now deleting the same internal object twice.
> I think this can be seen in https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/lo_ubsan/6
> 11/consoleFull and IMHO the easiest fix might be to just annotate
> that test for coverity. Maybe someone has a better idea.


should do the trick I believe, drop down to the C api to avoid that
osl::Pipe can't give up ownership of its oslPipe handle

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list