xmlsec patches

[Miklos Vajna]

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:50:07PM +0000, Caolán McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> wrote:
> So, do we know enough that the customkeymanage part isn't necessary for
> any known normal use of xml signing, I mean if we disable it, or build
> against a system version that doesn't have it, that the uses we do know
> about continue to work. I could live with that for at least distro
> builds to flush out if there is some useful purpose to it.

Commit ab50f0b08b22af1e60a0b6ce5e7e8e7d1f665216 is my attempt at
supporting this. I tested it only on openSUSE, but hopefully there is
nothing distro-specific in this, it's pkg-config.

Regards,

Miklos
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20170622/e90e4382/attachment.sig>