Some points on clang-format usage
sbergman at redhat.com
Fri Nov 17 14:48:43 UTC 2017
On 11/17/2017 12:19 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com> wrote:
>> ...which might be reason enough to still revisit the .clang-format rule that
>> causes leading commas, if that wrecks such havoc with comments?
> I think BreakConstructorInitializersBeforeComma is the relevant key.
> Setting it to false would not be controversial, it would just mean we
> leave that area alone, I believe.
appears to be no setting that both (a) consistently places each
initializer on a line of its own (the current behaviour IIUC; beneficial
for small diffs when modifying an initializer list) and (b) puts the
comma after the initializer (which would be beneficial for preserving
trailing comment placement).
More information about the LibreOffice