Some points on clang-format usage
vmiklos at collabora.com
Mon Nov 4 10:38:34 UTC 2019
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 11:08:43AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com> wrote:
> And another point that just occurred to me is that we will probably run into
> problems at some point in the future: It is likely that future C++
> standards will introduce constructs that cannot be parsed by clang-format
> 5.0.0, and that LO will use such constructs in files that are processed by
I'm happy to investigate an upgrade if there is a practical need for it.
I'm not sure we have any of that today; perhaps structured bindings?
But limiting the number of upgrades (to avoid reformat noise) probably
has some value.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the LibreOffice