AtomicCounter::is_always_lock_free on armel

[Stephan Bergmann]

On 06/11/2019 10:47, rene.engelhard at mailbox.org wrote:
> Am 6. November 2019 09:26:53 MEZ schrieb Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com>:
> , you could add an appropriate #if/else
>> (with
>> a useful comment) around the definition of AtomicCounter and the
>> accompanying static_assert.
> 
> Can do, yes, although I would like it more if it was fine upstream...

That's what I meant, provide an upstream commit.

>> (And address any resulting -Wvolatile on
>> armel as appropriate for your needs.)
> 
> As it (is it?) only a warning one can also just ignore it ;-)

Yes, that's likely all you need to do to address it appropriately for 
your needs.