[Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2020-03-05

Stephan Bergmann sbergman at redhat.com
Tue Mar 10 13:16:26 UTC 2020

On 10/03/2020 13:19, rene.engelhard at mailbox.org wrote:
> Am 10. März 2020 10:25:50 MEZ schrieb Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com>:
>> On 06/03/2020 16:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> And i think https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/88833 should then
>> be
>>> done, too, as it makes it more clear (what is a "subsequentcheck"?)
>> and
>>> would be a good rationale to rename
>> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase
>>> to something sane (that one is used for in the autopkgtests which run
>>> the junit tests against a installed (in /usr/lib/libreoffice) LO)
>> I'm not sure I understand you.  subsequentcheck is orthongonal to
>> JUnitTest.  There are JUnitTests that are not in subsequentcheck, and
>> there are tests other than JUnitTests that are in subsequentcheck.
> The OOoRunner tests, yes. Otherwise: no.

No idea what you mean with "yes" and "no" there.

> make subsequentcheck does only run java tests: cf. https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/blob/master/tests/junit. That one results in https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/libr/libreoffice/4506235/log.gz +search for the junit test.)

At least for my local build, that's not the case:

> $ make subsequentcheck
> [PYT] dbaccess_python
> [JUT] forms_complex
> [JUT] comphelper_complex
> [CUT] io_textinputstream

More information about the LibreOffice mailing list