RFC: Sane rectangle class

[Thorsten Behrens]

Luboš Luňák wrote:
>  I'm confused. I wrote that I find the API bad and that it would probably 
> require writing it again from scratch. You call that tweaking?
> 
Ain't that much code, so yeah, tweaks..

>  How is this bike-shedding? Discussing the code will get much harder
> without handling the basic design first.
>
Yeah but that design is harder to discuss in the abstract, vs. some at
least header file draft somewhere. ;)

> > Ugh. Really, at the end of any effort here should be the removal of
> > tools/gen.hxx. ;)
> 
>  That's realistically unlikely to happen in years, and for it to
> happen there actually needs to be any successful effort, which is
> more likely to happen if it's split into smaller more manageable
> steps.
>
Sure. I just don't want any new code (that's supposed to stay) ending
up in tools. And graphics algorithms and data types belong to basegfx,
really - regardless if they start with b2i or not. ;)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1032 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20200324/8aac147e/attachment.sig>