llvm/clang static analyzer reports
sbergman at redhat.com
Thu Oct 15 16:50:53 UTC 2020
On 15/10/2020 10:58, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 15/10/2020 09:51, Maarten Hoes wrote:
>> Just one more thing I need to mention. At some point during the
>> build/analysis, I run into the following:
>> The analyzer (or make, I can't tell which) goes looking for
>> '/usr/bin/clang-10++' (which isn't there) instead of
>> '/usr/bin/clang++-10'. In other words, it looks for clang-version++
>> instead of clang++-version. I haven't really investigated much, but
>> chose to be pragmatic and just add a symlink to work around the issue.
>> If this is an acceptable workaround, I'll add a README that mentions
>> this. On the other hand, if this is a dealbreaker and people want this
>> 'fixed' before continuing, then I am going to need a lot of help in
>> finding the root cause (so I can submit a bug report with the project
>> that causes the behaviour).
> We can have a look once you have sent something to Gerrit.
<https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/104383> "Rename CLANG_CC,
CLANG_CXX configuration vars (avoid clash with scan-build)" should get
More information about the LibreOffice