cppcheck algorithm suggestions
Luboš Luňák
l.lunak at collabora.com
Mon Jan 25 13:13:43 UTC 2021
On Saturday 23 of January 2021, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
> What are peoples feelings for cppcheck's suggestions for stl algorithms?
> In https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/109846 I did a 'any_of'
> and a 'accumulate' that it suggested; the any_of does look better,
> the accumulate seems marginally better.
To me they both seem as a regression. I find the original code easily
readable, I just look and see, while I need to "decypher" the std algo code.
> Does the project/people have general preferences on whether it's
> worth tackling these suggestions?
>
> I was less sure what to do with the suggestions for 'transform';
> some of them were replacing very simple loops; another
> was using emplace_back to add the results to the destination and I wasn't
> sure what I'd pass into transform for the equivalent.
Suggestions from an automated tool are just that, suggestions. IMO common
sense should be a higher priority than blindly following an automated tool.
--
Luboš Luňák
l.lunak at collabora.com
More information about the LibreOffice
mailing list